I am not repeating the same argument over and over I am responding to a number of different challenges to my original contention. You you expect me to change my contention or not respond to arguments to the contrary? Many points, many counterpoints, so far there hasnt been any change in my contenion because it hasnt been proven invalid due to these counterpoints I am being obligated to provide. get it? Defending a position and sticking with a position that hasnt be changed is not repeating the same argument over on over again. there have been a few repeat challages the got the exact same counterpoint from me but that also not me repeating myself, those are repeat challenges that needed repeat responses. I am NOT bringing anything back up, other people are, not me. what would be the point in me repeating what I already said for no reason???? jco
-----Original Message----- From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >If you want to join a big thread, READ > IT FIRST, then join it. that's how it works. Theres no point in this case as you keep repeating the same argument over and over... Pål
