Don't you have a GED class to attend? Seriously YOU started with these personal attacks without cause and you refused to read this long thread where all these things were discussed in great detail and from every possible angle ( far more than ever in the past). YOU SHOULD HAVEREAD THE THREAD because you are only putting your foot in your mouth by not knowing what everyone else who did read it knows. if you did you wouldn't be making these silly burning candle at both end arguments you are making. I told you this would happen didn't I??? JCO
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camera engineering (This is signifigant) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant) >answer the question how > can you say the program AE is important but COMPLETELY DROPPING AE >ALTOGETHER from K/M lenses with zero compatablity issues is fine? Since K/M lenses on their own do not support programmed AE (they lack the all important "A" setting), I don't see any contradiction. If K/M lenses supported programmed AE, and support for that was dropped, we would have a point of discussion. Meanwhile, you try to create contradictions in your own small, obtuse mind, then call others dumb for not playing your stupid little game. Don't you have a swimming pool to take pictures of? William Robb
