> This is just too much. if these lenses > are selling anywhere for anything more > that ZERO than they are not obsolete.
I think I'd have better luck persuading a fire plug to move to the other side of the street. Your statement above is ridiculous. People buy all kinds of obsolete stuff because they like it. They buy old wringer washing machines. Does that mean those washing machines aren't obsolete? > There is NO SENSE in pentax abandoning > THEIR OWN GOOD PRODUCTS without a good reason > to do so. Maybe they had good reason. It is your opinion that they didn't. You're basing that opinion on damned little evidence. You don't know anything about their design process, what conversations went on in the engineering spaces or what they're thinking about implementing in the future. It is my opinion that your opinion is invalid due to lack of evidence. It is also my opinion that the K and M lenses were great in their day but are now obsolete. They've been superseded by newer designs with greater capabilities. It is also my opinion that it's best to use the right tool for the job. I use a modern camera and I use modern lenses to take full advantage of the cameras capabilities and to get the best possible pictures. It is my opinion that it's foolish to do otherwise. Tom Reese
