So you are agreeing THAT EVERY K/M
LENS BOUGHT BY ANYONE NOW is bought
by some insane person or stupid
person? That would make you a K/M buyer
wouldn't it? Come on dude, do you
really honestly believe that all
these buyers are stupid insane people
who don't use them and like to burn money or what.
You really have got to be kidding
with that horse crap....

Secondly you ONCE AGAIN have not responded
to my second point, WHY DOES THE K/M
GREEN BUTTON PATCH EXIST? Are you now
saying that Pentax created a patch for
NO ONE??? 

Thirdly, you say you want newer lenses to
take advantages of the CAMERAS capabilities.
What about wanting CAMERAS that take advantage
of the LENSES capabilties????  These components
work together as a system. Would you want
a DSLR that cant AF your AF lenses????
Well this is the same damn thing, these K/M
lenses can do AE but the stupid body
design cant support them because of some
missing cheap parts. That's BAD. I don't
need to provide any further proof. BAD IS BAD.
Just try to do AE with the camera with K/M
lenses, it doesn't do it...Thats not damned
little evidence...Thats a fact....
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)


> This is just too much. if these lenses
> are selling anywhere for anything more
> that ZERO than they are not obsolete.

I think I'd have better luck persuading a fire plug to move to the other
side of the street.

Your statement above is ridiculous. People buy all kinds of obsolete stuff
because they like it. They buy old wringer washing machines. Does that mean
those washing machines aren't obsolete?

> There is NO SENSE in pentax abandoning
> THEIR OWN GOOD PRODUCTS without a good reason
> to do so.

Maybe they had good reason.  It is your opinion that they didn't. You're
basing that opinion on damned little evidence. You don't know anything about
their design process, what conversations went on in the engineering spaces
or what they're thinking about implementing in the future. It is my opinion
that your opinion is invalid due to lack of evidence.

It is also my opinion that the K and M lenses were great in their day but
are now obsolete. They've been superseded by newer designs with greater
capabilities.

It is also my opinion that it's best to use the right tool for the job. I
use a modern camera and I use modern  lenses to take full advantage of the
cameras capabilities and to get the best possible pictures. It is my opinion
that it's foolish to do otherwise.

Tom Reese




Reply via email to