TOM REESE WROTE :

"Maybe they had good reason" 

JCO:
- well after all this
discussion than WHAT IS IT? if you want to say I need
more evidence fine but I think it then behooves
you to first EVEN COME WITH A GOOD REASON
and then follow that with you own evidence
to support the reason you see. If you cant
then you are just blowing smoke screens....

Secondly - Your last statement is beyond
credibility because the right tool for 
the job might be a K/M lens that isnt
even available new anymore in FA mount
but you wouldn't know about such things
because you think all K/M lenses are worthless
obsolete items purchased by insane fools.
NOT ALL K/M lenses have a NEW equivilant
at all, let alone a new equivilant with
more features.

You simply don't understand the full
issues here. I suggest you open your
mind a little and spend some time
trying to come up with a good reason
for Pentax to be doing this. IF you
cant then don't tell me why Im wrong
or need more evidence to support my
contentions. you don't even know
why I am wrong but insist I am?
What the hell is that?
Earth to REESE.. Come in REESE.
jco



-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)


> This is just too much. if these lenses
> are selling anywhere for anything more
> that ZERO than they are not obsolete.

I think I'd have better luck persuading a fire plug to move to the other
side of the street.

Your statement above is ridiculous. People buy all kinds of obsolete stuff
because they like it. They buy old wringer washing machines. Does that mean
those washing machines aren't obsolete?

> There is NO SENSE in pentax abandoning
> THEIR OWN GOOD PRODUCTS without a good reason
> to do so.

Maybe they had good reason.  It is your opinion that they didn't. You're
basing that opinion on damned little evidence. You don't know anything about
their design process, what conversations went on in the engineering spaces
or what they're thinking about implementing in the future. It is my opinion
that your opinion is invalid due to lack of evidence.

It is also my opinion that the K and M lenses were great in their day but
are now obsolete. They've been superseded by newer designs with greater
capabilities.

It is also my opinion that it's best to use the right tool for the job. I
use a modern camera and I use modern  lenses to take full advantage of the
cameras capabilities and to get the best possible pictures. It is my opinion
that it's foolish to do otherwise.

Tom Reese




Reply via email to