Good question. I Google'ed it and came up with this:

"I did not mention refraction in the explanation I just gave.
Refraction lifts up the image of a celestial object near the horizon,
and the more the closer the object is to the horizon. Refraction can
only have a systematic effect in the vertical direction, because the
atmosphere is layered only in the vertical direction. It is impossible
to make everything appear, for example, twice as large in the
horizontal direction, because if that happened everywhere along the
horizon, then the horizon would have to be twice as large in
circumference, and that doesn't fit. So, the image of the Sun (the
solar disk) is equally wide at every height above the horizon.

The effect of refraction in vertical direction can be seen in the Sun
or Moon when they are low in the sky, because then the Sun and the
Moon appear a little squashed, because the bottom is lifted up more by
refraction than the top (because the bottom, as long as it is visible,
is closer to the horizon than the top). The Sun appears to be 15%
flatter when the bottom of the solar disk touches the horizon. When
the bottom of the Sun is still 1 degree (two diameters) above the
horizon, then the flattening is 10%. If the Sun is 5 degrees above the
horizon, then the flattening is only 2.5%.

So, refraction close to the horizon does not make the image of the Sun
or Moon larger, but rather smaller, because it is flattened in the
vertical direction. The effect is at most 15%, and in the wrong
direction, so it cannot explain the "small when high, large when low"
effect, which works in the other direction, does not change the shape,
and appears much greater than 15%. "

Under "Larger near the Horizon, Smaller Overhead":

http://www.astro.uu.nl/~strous/AA/en/antwoorden/sterrenbeelden.html

Dave


On 9/26/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know the technical reason that the sun renders as an ellipse when
> shot close to the horizon?
>
> TIA.
>
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>
>

Reply via email to