> What, me personally? For a 75/1.4 to go on my 35mm? As much as I paid > for the 77. Nothing, it's too short to be of use to me, and at that > price.
> YMMV :-) I don't really see myself planning on using my A 50/1.4 as a dedicated portrait lens (at an effective 75/1.4) on my DS. 75mm is for me also a wee bit to wide for the kinds of portraits that I usually take. (However, this is not to say that I won't use the lens on the DS - it's just that I am not used to thinking of portraits (YMMV) at 75mm. Actually, because of the DS's crop factor, I now have a "new" set of portrait lenses - an A* "127.5"/1.4, a K "202.5"/2.5, a Tokina AT-X "90-180"/2.8, etc. The crop factor is not really that big of a problem - it just requires a bit of a shift in thinking, but the same basic rules (for me) apply - a short portrait lens is for use in tight quarters, while a longer portrait lens is for use in a larger room or outdoors. Fred
