Yes, but this is a debate that should be DIScouraged!
It goes nowhere, achieves nothing (except depression), and has a terrible
tendency to repeat itself every few weeks. It's a malady, and the only
remedy is abstinence.
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:31:54 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
That pretty well sums it up for me. Good post, John.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:05 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Tom,
The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place,
and it certainly doesn't HELP Pentax. What is does is to distort
people's assessment of Pentax's true position.
Now boys......
Let's be honest...this *is* a discussion list, right?
And come on - Tom's line is not really negative. He's just trying to
encourage debate, right Tom?
Tom?
Right Tom?
(where is the bugger?? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
