Rob,
My statement referred only to the prolific posters; it had nothing to say
about non-prolific posters, and my words did not, and should not be taken
to, denigrate anybody who doesn't post prolifically.
I am fully aware that you are one of those who feels that Pentax does not
presently provide what you need, and I am also fully aware that while you
allude to this occasionally, you do not bang on about it endlessly. I
have no quarrel with you or your approach at all.
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:23:05 +0100, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1 Oct 2005 at 19:38, John Forbes wrote:
Have you noticed that the most prolific posters of pictures on this
site, and
the best photographers, do not as a rule jump on the Chongwagon. They
just get
on with life and take pictures.
I think you're making some rather short-sighted statements above. Just
because
forum participants choose not to post images doesn't mean that they
aren't
shooting, maybe they are just too busy to post images. Maybe they are
struggling with the fact that they may have to undergo a transition to
other
gear which will interrupt their work-flow because Pentax is moving like
sloth
WRT development. Maybe this is a Pentax forum, Pentax don't make
pictures they
make equipment (on occasion). There's always more than one side to a
story.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
