Sorry. Stepped out to take some photos. :)
I've never claimed Pentax makes bad products. I've only called into
question their slowness to market, the fact that the 2 other big players are
releasing upgrades/improvements to which Pentax has no answer in over 6
months, and their market direction. I don't actually have a burning
overwhelming need to express these points of view, but I searched the
internet from A-Z and figure the PDML is the most logical place to talk
about it.
If all the list said "Tom you're full of it", I might have to step back and
reassess my viewpoint. That hasn't been the case however.
Tom C.
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: "pentax list" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:31:54 +0100
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That pretty well sums it up for me. Good post, John.
>Paul
>On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:05 PM, John Forbes wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place,
>> and it certainly doesn't HELP Pentax. What is does is to distort
>> people's assessment of Pentax's true position.
Now boys......
Let's be honest...this *is* a discussion list, right?
And come on - Tom's line is not really negative. He's just trying to
encourage debate, right Tom?
Tom?
Right Tom?
(where is the bugger?? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
