----- Original Message -----
From: "Toralf Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William Robb wrote:
I don't mind the pessimism in general so much myself. What can get me a
bit worked up, is the continuous assertion that Pentax will always be
one step behind ........
We just have to look at their performance over the past 35 years or so to
figure this out.
What exactly do you mean by performance? You don't believe that the
products that sell most are always the best, do you? (If you do, you can't
possibly have heard about this little thing called "marketing".)
He's referring to Pentax always being one step behind.
Behind in AF, behind (non-existent) in USM, behind (non-existent) in
IS/Anti-shake, behind in etc, etc.
Christian
