Christian wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Toralf Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William Robb wrote:
I don't mind the pessimism in general so much myself. What can get
me a bit worked up, is the continuous assertion that Pentax will
always be one step behind ........
We just have to look at their performance over the past 35 years or
so to figure this out.
What exactly do you mean by performance? You don't believe that the
products that sell most are always the best, do you? (If you do, you
can't possibly have heard about this little thing called "marketing".)
He's referring to Pentax always being one step behind.
Behind in AF, behind (non-existent) in USM, behind (non-existent) in
IS/Anti-shake, behind in etc, etc.
Ah, yes, they are behind in thinking up completely nonsensical terms...
Sure glad my camera doesn't send ultrasonic waves into my body, as I
hear that they aren't quite as harmless as once twas thought...
- T
