Technically advanced and feature rich don't always translate to best.
Best is what does the job. Sometimes a "lesser" product that has what
you need is the best.
Quite.
As I read that, it occurred to me that technically advanced products are
almost by definition inferior. Well, it depends on how you use the term,
of course, but when you say "technically advanced" I automatically think
about designs that focus on the technology itself instead of sensible
application of it. A Good Product, on the other hand, is one that has
exactly the right amount of technology at exactly the right place - and
it will usually not be referred to as "advanced". The same with "feature
rich", more or less; when I hear that term I understand that it has been
more important to the designers to have *many* features than to have
*useful* ones. Again, that's not how good designers work...
- T
