> > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/10/06 Thu AM 02:34:11 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax... > > Must be your batteries, I find that 2500mAh AA NiMH cells equalize the > weight quite nicely.
Not mine, so I don't know. Can't remember if it had the grip on - I think it did. But my overwhelming impression was that I might drop it because it was so oddly weighted. Very inhibiting. > > mike wilson wrote: > > >>From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Date: 2005/10/05 Wed AM 04:59:16 GMT > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax... > >> > >>On 5 Oct 2005 at 6:48, DagT wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>I was referring to the fact that the 1Ds mkII is about the same size > >>>and weight as the Pentax 67, not the use. > >>> > >>> > >>What gets me is (if you've been watching the *ist D grip thread) that the > >>*ist > >>D sans grip is apparently too small for many people which is counter to the > >>general Pentax DSLRs are great because they're small discussions. > >> > >> > > > >I noticed that. It's very interesting - I had hoped that the DSLR line > >would be even smaller than the film SLRs, as there was no film/film > >transport to accommodate. No doubt the extra batteries and electronics > >account for that. Still a disappointment. > > > >I also find that the D (not handled any of the others) is very oddly > >balanced. Much heavier on the left than the right. Which is not to inject > >a dose of politics into this thread. 8-) > > > >mike > > > > > >----------------------------------------- > >Email sent from www.ntlworld.com > >Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software > >Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information > > > > > > > > > > > -- > When you're worried or in doubt, > Run in circles, (scream and shout). > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
