Thanks Bill, it's exactly the kind of bokeh I don't care for. This list just *saved* me some money, that's a switch!
Funny you should mention the A100, I was just looking at the M100 and an old A50 I have. A transplant just might be possible with a bit of re-engineering. Yo, Cotty! ;-) Don > -----Original Message----- > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SMCP M-100/2.8 versus SMCP 105/2.8?? Help! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Sanderson" > Subject: SMCP M-100/2.8 versus SMCP 105/2.8?? Help! > > > > Before I spend a good bit of money, how much better is > > the K105/2.8 than the M100/2.8? > > I'm most interested in bokeh and wide open performance. > > The size doesn't matter. ;-) > > I can't comment on the M, but I do have the 105. > It is an exceedingly sharp and contrasty lens, but the bokeh can > be kind of > funny. Have a look ar Fred's lens gallery. > I like the thing, but it needs backgrounds that are already pretty > smooth.I'm sort of on the lookout for an A100/2.8 (not the macro, > have one > already). > I loved the length of my 150/3.5, and would like a digital replacement. > > William Robb > >
