Here's the 300/4 at f/4 and f/11: http://donsauction.com/pdml/300_4.htm
Quite a difference. Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 1:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Opinions & adjustments & FS > > > I saw the pics and examples, looks like it's taken a few > good bumps in it's lifetime. > I'll post a couple of examples in a bit with mine. > Fortunately my case looks like it took all the bumps, > the lens looks 99% new. > > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 1:09 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Opinions & adjustments & FS > > > > > > At 11:30 2005.10.16 -0400, you wrote: > > >Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:15:44 -0500 > > >From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > >Collin I was curious about the 300 flare issue so I tried this: > > > > > >http://donsauction.com/pdml/300_4Flare.jpg > > > > > >Shot a few minutes ago directly up a sunbeam that was coming > > >thru the front window. (Still have a purple spot in my left > > >eye) ;-) > > >A lot of CA, probably from the sensor, but very little flare. > > >The reason I was curious is I didn't remember having flare > > >issues with this monster. Wonder if there's a bit of internal > > >haze/fog in yours, I've seen just a very little bit of haze > > >cause pretty pronounced flare. > > > > > >Don > > > > The internals seem clear. That's what has be confused as well. > > I wonder if there's a cell out of alignment. A CLA could resolve > > the issue. > > > > Collinl > > >
