I totally missed that last point! Thanks.

Tom C.

From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:32:59 -0400

I didn't think you were. I've never really had a problem with the missionaries, they even suffer to discuss religion with me, which I look upon as good sport since most of them are hardly biblical scholars, a half trained history teacher can usually run rhetorical rings around them. My point is that I've never had them threaten to go to court to force me to stop making them feel uncomfortable.

Tom C wrote:

Excuse me Peter.  Not attacking you...

I agree in general with you but I find your dislike for proselytizers someone at odds with other beliefs you seem to hold. You are certainly entitled to dislike whatever you wish. However, both religious groups you mentioned are following the dictates of their faith and consciences. Those are some of the same rights that hundreds of thousands of country men have died for in the 'defense of freedom and liberty'. The Supreme Court cases that were fought and won by Jehovah's Witnesses in the '40's have actually secured freedoms for all. It's largely because of those cases that the flag salute is not compulsory today.

When they come to your door they are exercising constitutional rights of freedom of speech we have all come to enjoy and usually take for granted. You of course are exercising your constitutional right not to listen.

Tom C.




From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:52:11 -0400

By definition, you're an atheist if you don't believe in God. It's not a definition used by religious people. There are atheists who wear that label proudly. I don't have a problem with Atheists who don't believe in God, I don't have a problem with the religious who don't try to force their religion on others, I do have problems with proselytizers, for or against God. I find that Atheist proselytizers tend to try to force their beliefs with the power of the law, where as most of my experience with religious annoyances are on a more personal level. I've gotten quite good at making Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses uncomfortable. It's a useful hobby.

A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle.
-Vique

Rob Studdert wrote:

On 18 Oct 2005 at 18:30, P. J. Alling wrote:



We were talking about belief, not just belief in God but also the belief in no god. Both are beliefs neither is in the least provable, that's what belief is.



So if no-one believed in God would all those people be atheist?

Atheist is simply a tag religious people apply to the non-religious, ie those who couldn't care less or really don't think about such things.




Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998






--
When you're worried or in doubt,     Run in circles, (scream and shout).





--
When you're worried or in doubt,        Run in circles, (scream and shout).


Reply via email to