I would not say abused, but it has traveled in a fanny pack
unprotected with an uncased LX that was also in there with three lenses in
cases. I have not scratched it yet, and I do recall one time thinking that
it would have its first one. The camera is a tool, not a jewel is the basic
motto for me. I will let you know when I get the first ding in it.
C�sar Matamoros II
Panama City, Florida
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Brogden [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why I won't be buying an MZ-S, and other ramblings with
> a rantat the very end.
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, P�l Jensen wrote:
>
> > Chris wrote:
> >
> > >Compared to the LX and its MF ilk, the MZ-S still feels flimsy to
> > > me, but it's better than most of what's out there.
> >
> >
> > I think you mix up low weight with solidity. I'm sure that if the MZ-S
> > weighted twice as much then it would be recognized as the most solid
> > brick out there. Its definitely more solid than the LX; the latter has
> > a very thin outer cover thats easy to dent.
>
> I agree about distinguishing weight from solidity, but what do we know
> about the solidity of the MZ-S? I can feel its lightness and compare that
> to my LX, but how can we say anything about its solidity unless we've
> bumped and knocked an MZ-S around for a while? Has anyone dented, dropped
> or abused theirs yet? :)
>
> chris
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
