Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał / wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Pĺl Jensen wrote:
>
> > Chris wrote:
> >
> > >Compared to the LX and its MF ilk, the MZ-S still feels flimsy to
> > > me, but it's better than most of what's out there.
> >
> >
> > I think you mix up low weight with solidity. I'm sure that if the
MZ-S
> > weighted twice as much then it would be recognized as the most
solid
> > brick out there. Its definitely more solid than the LX; the
latter has
> > a very thin outer cover thats easy to dent.
>
> I agree about distinguishing weight from solidity, but what do we
know
> about the solidity of the MZ-S? I can feel its lightness and
compare that
> to my LX, but how can we say anything about its solidity unless
we've
> bumped and knocked an MZ-S around for a while? Has anyone dented,
dropped
> or abused theirs yet? :)
>
> chris
>
All I can say is that I have had two LX bodies and they are so easily
dented, scratched and damaged that I must consider them to be the
most succeptible to damage pro-bodies I have ever used. For the sake
of comparison the mostly plastic Canon T90 body I owned many years
ago survived bumping or falling much better than an LX.
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Wejdź w Kontakt! Wygraj Nokie 9110i i rejs do Szwecji! <
http://kontakt.wp.pl/konkurs >
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
