Pål Jensen wrote:
I think a 16MP DSLR in a 35mm size (body and lenses) can offer more or
less
the same advantages when compared to a 18MP 645 system, both being a good
step over current 6MP DSLR's.
I think we all can agree that an MF DSLR that don't give better image
quality than a 35mm based DSLR don't make much sense....
I just don't think it will happen...
Hmmm... technology being equal, I don't expect 18MP to be so much better
than 16MP. OK, larger pixels should deliver better S/N ratio than smaller
ones, but... is technology equal? I'm afraid it won't.
Generally speaking, Kodak sensors are behind Canon and Sony. The 4/3 system
performs rather badly about noise control. OK, it's smaller than APS. But
the Kodak 14MP FF SLR delivered lower quality than the Canon 11MP FF SLR, so
why do you expect the 18MP Kodak to be better than the 16MP from Canon?
Dario
