Not according to Boz and I'll go with him.
Raimo K wrote:
Well, strictly speaking - they are not. Not even M lenses.
K bayonet, yes maybe - but what generation?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Small Pentax K lens test
They're all K lenses.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Very intersting and well done test, Jerry. But why do you call it a
K-lens
test. There's no K-lenses involved, is there?
Regards
Jens Bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Jarek Dabrowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. oktober 2005 03:38
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Small Pentax K lens test
Hello,
Just after purchasing DS - I decided to check it by running a small
comparison between all the lenses that I currently have in my drawer :)
I know that especially wide lenses are usually worse on digital body,
thank on film, but the results are pretty interesting.
Lenses compared:
- SMC-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6
- SMC-FA 20-35/4 AL
- SMC-FA 35/2 AL
- SMC-FA 50/1.4
- SMC-F 50/2.8 Macro
- Tamron SP XR Di 28-75/2.8
Enjoy:
http://www.dojarek.com/pktest/index_en.html
Jerry
--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
