I do believe I would have shot the background and the model separately.
Being basically a chicken that is.
<CLUCK, CLUCK>
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot another pic for a jewelry ad today. It's a low-budget
operation, so I did it without permits or permissions. When you see
the subject, you'll know why it made both me and the model a bit
nervous. Her fiance held up a big sign that said PHOTO SHOOT, and we
worked very fast. But I did manage to get off about a dozen shots,
and I'm happy with the results. The first one is probably quite a bit
better for the ad. The second one might be more fun. All with the
*istD and the FA50/1.4, ISO 400, f5.6@ !/90th.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822906&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822917&size=lg
