On 10/23/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I shot another pic for a jewelry ad today. It's a low-budget operation, > so I did it without permits or permissions. When you see the subject, > you'll know why it made both me and the model a bit nervous. Her fiance > held up a big sign that said PHOTO SHOOT, and we worked very fast. But > I did manage to get off about a dozen shots, and I'm happy with the > results. The first one is probably quite a bit better for the ad. The > second one might be more fun. All with the *istD and the FA50/1.4, ISO > 400, f5.6@ !/90th. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822906&size=lg > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822917&size=lg > >
i lik the first one best. she looks more impersonal and cold-blooded. my biggest problem is that i really didn't think she was wearing jewellery. i thought the thing hanging from her ear was an i-pod ear-bud <g>. -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
