With both photos, you've inspired me to work harder on my sky shots, although, I rarely seem to get as lovely a sky (or foreground) to work with as you do.
In my landscapes the sky always seems muddy (I blame pollution -- when you fly around here, you can see a brown layer about 2000 to 3000 above sea level) and the clouds are ill-defined. So I'm definitely loving all the detail I can see in your photo. Don't worry about the bottom, it's fine as far as I'm concerned. On 10/25/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=110&t=1 > > I've always been fond of this pic, but I think I chopped a bit too > much off the bottom after scanning (it was difficult to tell where > the edge of the frame was), and I'd prefer the clouds to be further > up in the frame. I could crop some off the top for a panoramic shot > but I do like those streaky clouds at top-left... >
