the 200 will be short for many kinds of wildlife photography.
I always carry a 200mm & a 300mm. The 300mm gets used a lot more than the
200mm (maybe 9 times out of 10 I choose the 300 over the 200).
The 300 f4.5 is the FA & the 200 is the f4.0 macro A.
Kenneth Waller
(does outdoor photos mostly)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: A* 200 f2.8 ED versus A* 300 f4
quality will be there but i think the 200 will be short for many kinds of
wildlife photography. depending on the sport, it may be too short for that
too.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Schork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:35 PM
Subject: A* 200 f2.8 ED versus A* 300 f4
I'm considering the A* 200 f2.8 ED and the A* 300 f4 for use on my istDS.
I really like the fact that both are relatively small in size.
I plan to use it for wildlife and sports photography.
