That's ok, they do the same thing to Nikon, Minolta and Olympus. -- Bruce
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 8:34:58 PM, you wrote: TC> Just trying to be realistic... TC> Tom C. >>From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: [email protected] >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side >>Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:29:00 -0400 >> >>And then Tom, with no digital camera, will scream, ""The sky is falling, >>the sky is falling." >> >>On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>>Which would be par for the course... followed by a competitor's press >>>release that their bottom of the line offering has the same 10MP and their >>>top models kick the you know what out... >>> >>>Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Reply-To: [email protected] >>>>To: <[email protected]> >>>>Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side >>>>Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:59:39 -0400 >>>> >>>>the Samsung/Pentax press releases say that next fall, we will have an >>>>announcement of a roughly $2K body. if the Nikon D200 comes in at about >>>>$2K instead of $2.5K, its capabilities are going to be the benchmark of >>>>comparison. i figure that Pentax can match the 10 megapixels because >>>>Samsung has no real choice if it wants to provide competitive sensors, >>>>but i'm not so sure of frame rate and AF performance. if the D200 comes >>>>in at around $2.5K, then Pentax doesn't have to be as high spec. >>>> >>>>Herb... >>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>To: <[email protected]> >>>>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:43 PM >>>>Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side >>>> >>>> >>>>>But some do, and for those people it would be nice to have the choice. >>>>>Anyhow >>>>>it will be mildly entertaining to see who here actually embraces an >>>>>updated >>>>>DSLR assuming that actually Pentax manages to deliver one inside the >>>>>next >>>>>decade, thank dog for archives. >>>> >>> >>> >>
