Fair go guy's. It's an excerpt from a book. I imagine if you had the hardcopy in front of you the pictures wouldn't be as hard to see.
Dave On 10/28/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Wrom: JVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJBLVLMHA > > Date: 2005/10/28 Fri AM 11:00:49 GMT > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Sharpening > > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > Interesting and worthwhile article about sharpening digital and scanned > > > images: > > > > > > http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/23471.html?cprose=daily > > > > > > > > > Shel > > > > Good article, but I seem to be missing something... > > In Figure 8 the author says the tree branches are "too sharp." > > What the heck does *that* mean? > > He proceeds to show a 1.5X insert, to illustrate what he means, and so > > far as I'm concerned, it has brought out the detail of the ends of the > > branches, against the sky. So why is that "a bad thing?" > > He is so immersed in the digital world, he doesn't realise that the digital > images he has used to illustrate the article are at least an order of > magnitude too small to be of any use. > > His next article will be on resizing. > > A case of complete and utter digimania, I'm afraid. So sad. > > m > > > ----------------------------------------- > Email sent from www.ntlworld.com > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software > Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information > >
