> > From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/10/28 Fri AM 11:56:00 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: Sharpening > > Fair go guy's. It's an excerpt from a book. I imagine if you had the > hardcopy in front of you the pictures wouldn't be as hard to see. > > Dave
Direction failure on my sense of humour again. If I was being serious, I would have targeted the twerp who prepared it for Web. m > > On 10/28/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Wrom: JVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJBLVLMHA > > > Date: 2005/10/28 Fri AM 11:00:49 GMT > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Sharpening > > > > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > > > Interesting and worthwhile article about sharpening digital and scanned > > > > images: > > > > > > > > http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/23471.html?cprose=daily > > > > > > > > > > > > Shel > > > > > > Good article, but I seem to be missing something... > > > In Figure 8 the author says the tree branches are "too sharp." > > > What the heck does *that* mean? > > > He proceeds to show a 1.5X insert, to illustrate what he means, and so > > > far as I'm concerned, it has brought out the detail of the ends of the > > > branches, against the sky. So why is that "a bad thing?" > > > > He is so immersed in the digital world, he doesn't realise that the digital > > images he has used to illustrate the article are at least an order of > > magnitude too small to be of any use. > > > > His next article will be on resizing. > > > > A case of complete and utter digimania, I'm afraid. So sad. > > > > m > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Email sent from www.ntlworld.com > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software > > Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
