Christian wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Glad you're attempting this. I just wonder how many will comply with the > > resultant outcome. > > Really no need for more than 800 X 800 @ 72 with moderate jpeg > > compression, yielding a file of no more than 75 to 150 kb > > That's pretty much what I try to keep my images to for web display. > > I figure there are people using 800x600 in which case an 800pixel image is > slightly too big but I figure there are more people with 1024x768 so an > 800pixel image is a good size. I also try to be considerate of people with > dial up connections and, except for once or twice, try to keep image size > >150kb > > Christian
My philosophy, as well and, um, I do have dial up annsan
