Of course. I misinterpreted your previous post. It's only a matter of
time before it all disappears. I'm surprised they're working so hard to
prolong the inevitable. Although I suppose there is still profit to be
made in supplying the last wave of film shooting cinematographers. Of
course this use goes much beyond major motion pictures, since a lot of
commercial production is still shot on film. But it's all changing.
Paul
On Nov 1, 2005, at 8:53 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
i know that. nonetheless, Kodak is forecasting a large drop in revenue
from movie film sales, and most of the money is in the prints.
Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: New film from Kodak
You're talking about prints. This film is a negative film intended
for recording the original images. For most uses, the negative is
transfered to digital rather than printed on a positive. Even when a
positive is needed for distribution it's made from the digital
transfer, not from the negative.
