On 10 Nov 2005 at 21:21, Herb Chong wrote: > for certain types of action, you don't have to shoot quick bursts, but is > that a reflection of knowing the camera's limits and not trying to exceed > them, or because you simply aren't interested? i can imagine a picture > sequence of spawning salmon leaping a waterfall where you might want to > capture a leap and a failure from beginning to end. one picture in the > middle isn't the same impact as 10 or 15 in a row. think of WR's posted > sample of an adult bald eagle attacking and snatching a fish from a > juvenile. one image might catch the peak of the action, but a sequence can be > more powerful in telling a story.
http://www.oceanwideimages.com.au/categories.asp?cID=112&p=2 Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
