On 11/16/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank, > > Thanks for your comments. You've damaged your > reputation as a blur-o-phile even more!
Sorry! But, as I keep saying, there's good blur, and there's not-so-good blur... <g> > > Actually, I would have preferred the headstone either > sharper or fuzzier. Well, that's the problem. The headstone, for me at least, should have been either so blurry that it was unreadable, or sharp enough to comfortably read. As is, it's right in between, so I find myself straining to read it. > It was a difficult exposure > situation, though, with a breeze stirring the leaves > and making a slow shutter speed/smaller aperture > impractical. Went back there Monday to try again, but > all the leaves were gone. Maybe next year... I think you did as much with the exposure as you could in that situation. Maybe next year, if you remember... <g> frank, frank > > Rick > > --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/15/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Here is the URL: > > > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3881996 > > > > I like this one, but I might prefer the headstone to > > be a bit sharper. > > Still, well composed. > > > > -frank > > -- > > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri > > Cartier-Bresson > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
