graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >First let me say I am against the idea of passing laws against maybes. > >Having said that, it does not take much imagination to see the glorious >leader pointing out to his paradise bound disciples, "You want to place >your explosives here, and here, and here", pointing to the places on the >photograph. Such photos can be a great help planning attacks.
Sorry but I don't buy it. Photographs of the WTC were of no help in this manner! For suicide belt bombers, a hand-drawn sketch on the back of a napkin is more than sufficient. For attacks between these two extremes, published photos in books, magazines,the Internet would be sufficient. It's just a desire on the part of "the authorities" to appear as if they're doing *something*.
