I don't know who the hell he's writing for, but mass market would
imply... I'm not sure, that there's a market for complete BS?
John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:41:38PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Brooks"
Subject: What the F??
Review and discuss.
Your equipment DOES NOT affect the quality of your image.
Ever seen anything of Kenny's bigger than about 600x1000 pixels?
Ever heard of Kenny prior to the internet?
I thought not.
William Robb
Also, bear in mind that he's writing for the mass market
(and you know what P.T. Barnum had to say about the public).
I doubt if his average reader comes anywhere close to finding
the limits of their equipment, let alone being able to detect
(equipment-related) shortcomings in their exposures.
Heck, let's face it; even on a self-selected list of gearheads
like the PDML, the vast majority of shots that are exhibited
are exceptional because of the skill of the photographer; the
kit lens on a DS (or an MV with the 50/f1.7, or a Spotmatic, ...)
in the right hands can produce stunning results.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
