You think correctly.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Adam Maas wrote:
I think you mean IBM processors. HP's never made a PowerPC processor,
rather they had PA-RISC and now Itanic.
And price a Power4 system someday. The Mac is significantly cheaper
for equivalent performance (Well, if you match the number of Cores,
Power4's are multi-core, PPC970's are single or dual core only).
-Adam
graywolf wrote:
Gee, BSD, works for that? Well I'll be hornswaggled. HP processors,
BSD (Unix) operating system, PC components. Yep those Macs are really
something special.
Before OS X you could not have given me one. Now that they ahave
grown up I would like to have one myself. Someone send me the money.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 5:29 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
... Our nearby university, and my alma mater, Virginia Tech just
recently
built a supercomputer by interconnecting some humongous number of
high-end desktop machines. They used Macs for this project in spite
of the higher costs, primarily because of much greater reliability in
their experience. It works great and some other universities are
following their lead.
Again interesting, I hadn't heard of Mac farms usually they tend
to use PC
servers running some form of UNIX, maybe they are now harnessing
the UNIX side
of the Macs now that the OS has grown up?
Do a search on "virginia tech supercomputer". Their teraserver, in
2003, was the third-fastest supercomputer in the world, comprised
of 1100 Power Macintosh G5 2Ghz DP boxes coupled together with
some extreme high-speed communications equipment. It runs Mac OS X.
Modifications to Mac OS X were extremely small to achieve this:
they dropped in a revised memory allocator (standard one is
optimized for balanced performance on a client system, a
distributed supercomputer requires a different optimization
strategy to maintain maximum throughput). Total change was 800
lines of source code (I was on the team that assisted in this
project). Later versions are even faster since they moved to the
Xserve box instead of the desktop system.
Many other universities and labs have built distributed
supercomputers based on this effort's success.
BTW: Discussions that resolve to more inane "mac vs pc vs linux vs
who-knows-what" babble are really not worth the time to read.
Godfrey
