On 1 Dec 2005 at 22:41, Toralf Lund wrote: > Sounds like the way it should be... I must say that when I express a > certain scepticism to digital photography now and then, it's partly > because of all the talk about the "workflow" on this list and elsewhere, > which gives me the impression that although you also read a lot about > how "simple" digital is, it has actually introduced extra work that *has > to be done*...
Not a lot of "extra" work once you have developed a procedure that suites you. > Also, I've never thought a lot about "colour balance" with film, but > perhaps that's because the lab has done the job for me? I wonder if > there are many labs that will accept "raw" files and do something > productive with them these days, by the way. Most of the "consumer" ones > I've come across seem to know of no other file format than JPEG, if you > know what I mean... Slide shooters think about colour balance and believe me it's a lot more work adjusting for colour balance before the shot than after in a digital work-flow. Labs that accept RAW files won't become commonplace until a RAW file standard such as DNG is adopted. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
