On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:53:34PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2005, at 2:18 PM, John Francis wrote: > > >I don't need ACR 3.2, or whatever the latest version is; 3.1 (or > >even 2.3) > >works just fine with images from my D > > I find that ACR 3.2 improved processing speed and quality over ACR > 3.1, and I expect that ACR 3.3 will do the same over v3.2. > > Why wouldn't you want the most recent version?
As has already been mentioned, I can get and run it with Elements 3, should I choose to do so. Were I running CS 2 I probably would get each new update as it came along, but I didn't see anything listed in the changes between 3.1 and 3.2 that would affect me; as far as I could see the new changes weren't in the basic interface available through Elements, but in the advanced processing only available from the CS2 interface.
