Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not even close -
You have to decide for yourself what quality you're willing to accept, and
that depends in great part on what you intend to do with the scanned
images.
I guess the idea would be to make some quick scans in order to show
people some of my pictures the electronic way, rather than doing the
full image processing routine I got myself involved in a discussion
about yesterday. One of the things I'm wondering about, is whether the
scan quality of one of the cheap photo scanners would be better than the
one of scans I've sometimes got from low-cost labs along with developed
film, and that some of them now offer to do from existing negative
strips for 1NOK a frame or whatever (for high volumes.)
And I have some 120 negs, too (from a plastic fantastic camera ;-)). I'm
assuming real film scanners that also accept MF are rather on the
expensive side, but I haven't really checked a lot...
- Toralf
