I've read that 360 is optimum for Epson printers in more than one place
and on more than one occasion. 300 may be fine, but 360 is working for
me. . I don't think there's a downside to it. I have experimented with
resolutions as low as 200 and have seen inferior results when viewed at
close range.
Paul
On Dec 3, 2005, at 6:28 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A 360 dpi file is optimum for the Epson 2200 and 2400. Yes, there are
files that will print fine at 180 dpi, but as you noted, not all will
do so. To keep my methods standard, I upsize every file to print at
360 dpi. But as I noted, I do it in the RAW converter. It may not
always be necessary, but it's foolproof.
Why 360 rather than 300? A techie at Epson told me that anything over
200 was just wasted. I standardized ages ago on 300. I can't see any
difference between prints made from files at 200, 300 or 360 on my
2200.
Bob
