thanks for the feedback. Trust me, it would not have been easier to reshoot :-). It might have been difficult to make the carpet look right under any circumstances. it's one of those deep pile carpet that shows light in different ways depending on its crush. Cloning was undoubtedly the best choice. I did it for three different shots. Each of them was identical to the others in terms of wall color, but the carpet was all over the place due to different camera angles. Now they match.
> Thats alot of work Paul, but the pic looks better. It might be easier > to retake the shot though, rake the carpet first. ;) > > rg > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Okay, the footprints on the carpet are apparently a problem. I fixed them, > straightened out the bedspread, cloned the light out of the mirror and > corrected > the barrel distortion. Thanks to all who have helped with this. It's > important > to me that I get it as correct as possible, and the pdml critics have been a > huge help.The new version is here: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3924131&size=lg > > > > The previous version is here: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3924346&size=lg > > > > > > > >>Nice job correcting. The image is bright and very sharp. You did a > >>great job with the 12-24. I do agree with the others however, the > >>carpet would look much nicer smoothed out, and the bedspread > >>straightened out at the bottom, just my preference. > >> > >>rg > >> > >> > >>Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> > >>>Here's the same shot with the perspective corrected: > >>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3924346&size=lg > >>> > >>>The original is here: > >>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3924131&size=lg > >>> > >> > > >
