How does the fact that Bob combined three smaller-sized JPEGs to make the 6.5mb panorama effect the picture. Essentially he was printing three 2.2mb quality JPEGs, just all together, or is my reasoning flawed? And what does stitching together three JPEG files do to the information contained in those files?
Shel "You meet the nicest people with a Pentax" > [Original Message] > From: Rob Studdert > Just looking at a typical image of mine with high detail and saved as a 16bit > tiff has a 67MB file size, converted to 8bit and saved as best quality jpeg it > ends up at 5.4MB. I'd hazard a guess that if both files were printed at the > optimum print resolution and colour space they would likely be > indistinguishable on all but the very best of todays printers.
