Markus, governments and activists have sub organizations to do that.
I've never heard of a business provoking someone to destroy their lively
hood. Occam's razor rules, usually a cigar is just a cigar. Convoluted
conspiracy theorys that put the culpability back on the victims fall
apart on close examination, but you can believe anything you want, after
all it is a belief.
Markus Maurer wrote:
Things like that happen Peter in a market as big as the chemical or fur
industry.
Ever heard of "agent provocateurs" ?
greetings
Markus
-----Original Message-----
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: No fur, No photos
Another conspericy theroy, a great way to protect the guilty if you can
accomplish it.
Bob W wrote:
Rather a broad brush you're painting with there, Jostein. It
doesn't follow
that someone who hides their face condones extreme action of
that type. The
extremists in the animal rights movement have had a very
damaging effect on
the mainstream. Suspiciously so, wouldn't you say?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 December 2005 22:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: No fur, No photos
That may be because today's animal activists are more prone
to use illegal and stupid forms of action. Like releasing
North-American minks from fur farms in Europe. Apparently,
wild European ferrets are not worthy of concern.
I'd vote to have animal activists replacing rats in the lab, too.
Jostein
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
