In a message dated 7/22/01 12:32:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>>You're looking at that with hindsight. It was built with the
 techniques and technology of the time.  I suspect the
 designers and builders were not aware of the changes that
 would take place.  But yet, the building and equipment stands,
 and they have given you some satisfaction and pleasure
 (perhaps even some good photographs) and a sense of what
 things were like in our past.<<
 
In the past, things were built with ~one~ thought only: "this should outlast 
~me~, since life expectancy was only about 47 years for white males, less for 
others. 

>>I believe that preservation of the past, through buildings,
 and the objects we use on a daily basis, whether currently
 useful or obsolete, are an important part of our culture and
 heritage.<<

But today, they only show our profligacy (the Concorde) and our technical 
arrogance more than demonstrating that we were caring or thoughtful people or 
even worse, that we even had ~souls~.
*Who would erect a monument to a NOKIA cellphone?**
**Though Coke did build a "monument" to their own product down in Atlanta.

>>By making everything disposable, and planning on
 obsolescence, what will remain of our culture, history, and
 heritage in 100 or 200 years?<<

>>I was watching a show about ancient Rome, and there were some
 scenes of buildings that were built in those days that are
 still being used today.  Pretty amazing.  Can't imagine why
 the Italians didn't just bulldoze 'em into the ground.<<

They will someday, if not in our lifetimes. Old buildings (or anything), no 
matter what their importance, will be torn down because today, and probably 
more so in the future, taxpayers won't tolerate spending money on things that 
do ~nothing~ but suck up resources.

>>The world is filled with buildings that are 400 or 500 years old,
 or older, some of which stand as reminders of the past and
 others, while serving that purpose, are also being used today,
 some in their original states and others having been
 modernized and upgraded with contemporary amenities.  I do not
 see that as a waste of resources.<<
 
Using whose tax money? Shepherding the past will soon become too expensive.

>>Using your argument one can argue that the Inca and Mayan
 temples and buildings were over built and were a waste of
 resources.  I don't think anyone who has been to Machu Pichu
 would take that position.<<

But... but, without the ever-expanding needs of archeologists to find things, 
(to keep themselves in business), Machu Pichu would still be under 8 feet of 
dirt, its treasures still buried from prying eyes. It was western 
archeologist who prompted the restoration of the Sphinx.  
The Coliseum in Rome, an outrageous, ~obscene~ monument to human butchery on 
a scale and variety not even the killing fields of Cambodia match, ought to 
be torn down. But no! Tearing the Coliseum down would offend too many 
people's sensibilities. 
We need to do to some of the "monuments" what the allies did to Nazi 
monuments, tear them down, especially the "Temples" where literally millions 
died just to salve some ritual or ego or worse, some "God."    

For me, though the Eiffel Tower is another erection due to vanity, I think 
maybe it, among a few others, the Statue of Liberty being one, represents art 
or philosophy more than vanity or cruelty or victory-etc. 
*Using my somewhat eclectic standards then, the Gateway Arch at St. Louis, 
another obscene monument to white vanity, would be torn down and a monument 
to the native peoples displaced (exterminated) by Europeans erected.

We ~must remember that all man-made monuments, including the Pyramids, will 
crumble into dust. In 500,000 years, even the Pyramids will have been worn 
down to nondescript mounds, remembered by no one... on the assumption that 
humankind itself will still be around. In any case, they will be too busy 
~surviving~ to invest time or especially money in foolishness like monument 
keeping. Remember, the now storied "Valley of the Kings" was nearly invisible 
when first found. Western archeology found then raped the monuments of Egypt, 
their booty resting in museums and private collections.  
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to