It's not their job to publish inspirational and joyful photos. The world is awash with that type of photo. What it's short of is good hard news photography.
The big news stories of the year have been the tsunami, hurricanes and so on, so that's what you'd expect to feature. What would people have said about balance if at the end of 2001 there had been nothing about the WTC attacks? -- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 December 2005 17:15 > To: pentax list > Subject: Re: Time Magazines Best Photos of the Year 2005 > > On 12/12/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Depressing bunch of photos. I mean I know it's PJ stuff, but surely > >they could have found some inspirational and joyful photos > to publish. > > I agree entirely. I good set of pics is all about balance. No > balance here. There are some outstanding individual examples, > but as a set, they do not live up to the title they bare given Time. > > Let's see Nat. Geo's set!
