2 years ago I decided to acquire the FA35/2. Both for
its good reputationd and also preparing for digital.
Now that I have recently acquired a Ds, I think that
this was a good decision. I have been using the lens a
lot for candid shots (mainly friend's kids) with
available light and I find it more useful than the kit
lens for this purpose.
Funny enough, some time after the FA35 purchase, I
sold my K35/3.5 to Kostas, and I am glad to hear that
he finds it as good as I did.
Regards,
Jaume
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > Hi Bill, the only reason the 40 is in the running
> is that I
> > already have the K35/2, K35/3.5 and A35/2.8.
> > I'll feel a little guilty buying another 35 with
> the 2
> > excellent K's on the shelf. I've heard so many
> good things
> > about the FA35/2 though.........
> > I've never even _seen_ an A35/2!
> >
> > I do have an M40/2.8 but the rear element is
> seperating.
>
> I can see a way out of this Don. If you can take the
> pain of parting
> with a K-lens or two, that is.
>
> If I was using the 35 much, and esp. if I had a -D,
> I would probably
> have parted company with my excellent K35/3.5 and
> replaced it with the
> FA35/2. YMMV.
>
> Kostas
>
>
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
