Not exactly traditional...
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Traditional glamour:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2839432
On Dec 19, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are a few of us who regularly post photos that are nowhere near
the
category of glamour and traditional portraits. This one is certainly
not a
glamour shot:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/sue.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Glen
I was just
wondering if everyone had become so "glamour" and "traditional
portrait"
oriented that an experimental shot which didn't glorify the beauty
of the
subject didn't have much of a chance.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
