-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Samsung GX-1L? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:09:44 -0700 From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] This one, perhaps? http://www.dpreview.com/news/0511/05110701cypress9mp.asp ---------- Hmmm. That Kodak camera, at least in its first incarnation, had a reputation for being noisy. I don't want to sacrifice the lovely, smooth images I currently get at ISO 200 for more pixels. Joe
- [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?] Joseph Tainter
- [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?] Joseph Tainter
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?] Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?] Pål Jensen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?] Pål Jensen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1... frank theriault
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung ... Godfrey DiGiorgi

