Cotty wrote: > > On 23/12/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Thank you kind sir :-) > >On Dec 23, 2005, at 6:57 PM, Cotty wrote: > > > >> BTW, nice catch despite the blown background ;-)))))) > >> > > Now that I'm sober, I was just making fun of the fact that a lot of > people here IMO pay too much attention to numbers and not enough to the > image. In TV here they're called '1-Volters' because they watch the > oscilloscope and not the picture. A pic like this is actually enhanced > by the 'blown' background. Blown in quotes because to me it doesn't > matter whether it's technically perfect or not. The important thing is > the moment captured and that's it. And what you captured is a nice shot > with lovely light blazing in. I really like it a lot because of the > lighting. Well done to you Paul, have a good holiday season and chat soon :-) > > regards, > > Cheers, > Cotty >
Hey Cotty we are back to full agreement (after wes disagreed about something a couple of weeks ago -- and if you remember what it is don't tell me :) :) shorter version: What he said. I like Paul's shot a lot. ann > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________
