My assumption regarding the lens mount is based only on information
presented here in regard to optimum angles for light distribution to a
sensor. And of course the fact that those makers without a large lens
mount have opted for APS-C. I also find it interesting that everyone
seems to assume that a full-frame Pentax digital would somehow be much
more affordable than a full-frame Canon. I doubt if anyone can better
the price of the 5D. But as I said, I'm happy with APS-C, as are the
people I work with.
Paul
On Dec 26, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 26 Dec 2005 at 12:56, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Count me out. I'm happy with APS-C. Full frame would require a new
lens
mount to be effective. I can't afford all new glass.
What do you base this supposition on?
So fror those who
want full frame, Canon is the easy and obvious choice. Why wish? You
can have it now.
I could sell my house and buy a nice new Lambo too, but we have to be
practical.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
