The K105/2.8 is an exemplary lens. It's sharp, it has good
bokeh, it's built very well, has a great feel when focusing -
IOW, it's a classic. The M100/2.8 is a mediocre lens. It's a
downsized plastic toy by comparison. It's neither as sharp
nor as well built.
The K105/2.8 is also rather scarce. It, along with a number
of other K lenses, is considered by many to be amongst the
best lenses ever produced by Pentax.
Scooterman wrote:
>
> What's all the hub-bub over this lens for?
> If you had a 105/2.8 & a 100/2.8 side-by-side... why'd you choose one
> over the other??
--
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
